Tagged Posts

A New mayor for London

Gravatar of this user
We are fast approaching the time when all Londoners — like myself — will have to vote for a new mayor. So far we have had Ken and Boris in the post.

You'll note I did not include their family names, indeed very rarely to the media find it necessary to to do so either, their personal names being totally sufficient for everyone in London (and many further afield) to know who is being referred to.

The LibDem candidate, generally, has not had this level of name recognition in the past. Vote for Susan! required the seven million or so Londoners to know Ms Kramer better than they probably did. Support Simon! had some level of name recognition for Mr Hughes because of his activities as a fairly well-known London MP, but still he didn't win against the 'popular' Ken and Boris show.

Arguably, the voters in this contest haven't really taken the position of London-wide Mayor as seriously as they ought to; it appears to many to be more of an opportunity for PR stunts than a serious position responsible for setting the policies which enable London to grow and to run the transport and other public services. So maybe, just maybe, it is time for the LibDems to offer up a candidate who has as much of a 'knock-about' reputation as Ken and Boris do?

Lembit!

In his favour he has national name recognition in the same way — and possibly stronger than — Ken and Boris. He has been seen to not take himself too seriously, appearing on television quiz shows and the like, but also has a great record as an MP. His perceived negative, of course, is that unlike Ken and Boris he isn't seen as 'a Londoner'. But then Boris wasn't when he got elected; he'd been pretty much seen as the Henley-on-Thames candidate.

Mike Tuffrey has also thrown his hat into the LibDem selection 'ring', on the grounds of his sterling service to the GLA and right back to GLC days, but whilst he is known in London political circles he has zero name recognition at large and will suffer in the same as Susan Kramer did for that.

It will be interesting to see whether the LibDems will select the candidate more likely to win, or one who is more in keeping with the Party line but certain to lose.
15-Jun-2011 09:35 · Trackback ·
tags: · · · ·
blinklist icon  blogmarks icon  del.ocio.us icon  digg icon  facebook icon  live.com icon  newsvine icon  reddit icon  slashdot icon  spurl icon  stumbleupon icon  technorati icon  yahoo! icon 

A New "Routemaster"?

Gravatar of this user
On the day we discover how empty the public purse really is, Boris Johnson — somehow elected as Mayor of London — unveils his new shiny.



A "Routemaster" in name only it will move fewer people than the buses it will replace; has no rear window to check what the bus following is for when you need to change routes; has no front seats upstairs — thus missing the whole point of a double decker — and is longer and wider than the original so won't deal with City streets and junctions so well (which was, indeed, the whole reason for the design features of the original Routemaster).

It is also massively more expensive than the alternatives at £300,000 per bus after the initial development costs of £1,200,000 per bus for the first five.
18-May-2010 18:03 · 1 Comment · Trackback ·
tags: ·
blinklist icon  blogmarks icon  del.ocio.us icon  digg icon  facebook icon  live.com icon  newsvine icon  reddit icon  slashdot icon  spurl icon  stumbleupon icon  technorati icon  yahoo! icon 

The map is not the territory

Gravatar of this user

From news.bbc.co.uk …

Transport for London have released a revised tube map. They've added symbols for disabled access to the default map instead of making it a separate one. So far, so good. The 1956 Beck map But they've removed the Thames. Now I've been a lover of Harry Beck's design since I first saw it as a child, and it is worth noting that the river has been a part of the schematic map since it was first created, back in 1931. Even the awful Hutchison redesign of November 1962 didn't try to remove it, so why TfL thought it was the right thing to do now I've really no idea. You have to go back to the Stringemore map of 1926 to find a tube map without the river of London marked. There are further issues with the revised map such as the inclusion of the former East London Line, marked as the future London Overground yet showing a station which will not exist on the new line and terminating at what will become through stations! Come on TfL; get your act together and bring back our river!
17-Sep-2009 23:40 · Trackback ·
tags: · ·
blinklist icon  blogmarks icon  del.ocio.us icon  digg icon  facebook icon  live.com icon  newsvine icon  reddit icon  slashdot icon  spurl icon  stumbleupon icon  technorati icon  yahoo! icon 

I still have a soft spot

Gravatar of this user

From www.totalpolitics.com …

Ken is someone I 'grew up with' in many ways; first his stint taking over the GLC and then more recently his founding of the GLA. I always thought it highly amusing that where County Hall — the seat of the GLC — was directly opposite Westminster, City Hall — where the GLA was eventually based — was well out of sight of the Houses of Parliament, over by Tower Bridge. Indeed, being on the opposite bank of the river to the Tower of London there were moments when I expected someone to shout "Off with his head!"

Ken Livingstone

Now, in an interview with the doyen of Tory pundits, Iain Dale, he is letting us know he isn't out for the count and intends to stand again for London leader.

I cant — quite — decide whether to wish him well. That he has done (or tried to do) many good things in his time at the GLC and GLA is beyond question so far as I am concerned. Whether he should be welcomed back for a third bite of the cherry I'n not so sure.
19-Mar-2009 11:43 · Trackback ·
tags: · ·
blinklist icon  blogmarks icon  del.ocio.us icon  digg icon  facebook icon  live.com icon  newsvine icon  reddit icon  slashdot icon  spurl icon  stumbleupon icon  technorati icon  yahoo! icon